<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dream Of The Marionettes Is Still Very Much A Dream (Fringe Festival 2010)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thehappiestmedium.com/2010/08/dream-of-the-marionettes-is-still-very-much-a-dream-fringe-festival-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thehappiestmedium.com/2010/08/dream-of-the-marionettes-is-still-very-much-a-dream-fringe-festival-2010/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dream-of-the-marionettes-is-still-very-much-a-dream-fringe-festival-2010</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Tortora-Lee</title>
		<link>http://thehappiestmedium.com/2010/08/dream-of-the-marionettes-is-still-very-much-a-dream-fringe-festival-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Tortora-Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehappiestmedium.com/?p=11675#comment-1820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for taking a moment to write in to discuss the finer points of the word &quot;burlesque&quot; (Which is what I assume you&#039;re doing?  You don&#039;t seem to have an issue with the review itself?  If so - it wasn&#039;t mentioned).

While I do agree with you that bulesque, as an art form, doesn&#039;t have EVERYTHING to do with &quot;taking it off&quot; to say it doesn&#039;t have ANYTHING to do with stripping isn&#039;t quite true either - especially in this most recent surge of underground burlesque that has been hitting the downtown scene.  To expect a little more skin isn&#039;t necessarily a misdirected expectation.  And for Lina to voice that expectation doesn&#039;t necessarily mean she has no knowledge of the history of burlesque.  Regardless . . . to call it &quot;an embarrassment&quot; for the site lies in the eye of the reader, I would think.

What I&#039;m glad for here is the openness of discussion. Lina said what she had to say about the topic, and your reply, though a bit prickly, ensued such that the end result was additional information on the topic - or at least a notion that if people wish to explore it further - they should.

I would like to see this continue here on The Happiest Medium; where we keep cultivating an atmosphere in which people feel free to share opinions and information. What better way to educate ourselves, expand our views, and understand each other more completely?

The more we are able to communicate skillfully all the way around and have genuine curiosity for why someone believes the way they do, the more we can have that valuable, open exchange.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for taking a moment to write in to discuss the finer points of the word &#8220;burlesque&#8221; (Which is what I assume you&#8217;re doing?  You don&#8217;t seem to have an issue with the review itself?  If so &#8211; it wasn&#8217;t mentioned).</p>
<p>While I do agree with you that bulesque, as an art form, doesn&#8217;t have EVERYTHING to do with &#8220;taking it off&#8221; to say it doesn&#8217;t have ANYTHING to do with stripping isn&#8217;t quite true either &#8211; especially in this most recent surge of underground burlesque that has been hitting the downtown scene.  To expect a little more skin isn&#8217;t necessarily a misdirected expectation.  And for Lina to voice that expectation doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean she has no knowledge of the history of burlesque.  Regardless . . . to call it &#8220;an embarrassment&#8221; for the site lies in the eye of the reader, I would think.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m glad for here is the openness of discussion. Lina said what she had to say about the topic, and your reply, though a bit prickly, ensued such that the end result was additional information on the topic &#8211; or at least a notion that if people wish to explore it further &#8211; they should.</p>
<p>I would like to see this continue here on The Happiest Medium; where we keep cultivating an atmosphere in which people feel free to share opinions and information. What better way to educate ourselves, expand our views, and understand each other more completely?</p>
<p>The more we are able to communicate skillfully all the way around and have genuine curiosity for why someone believes the way they do, the more we can have that valuable, open exchange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bolivar Schaghnaste</title>
		<link>http://thehappiestmedium.com/2010/08/dream-of-the-marionettes-is-still-very-much-a-dream-fringe-festival-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-1819</link>
		<dc:creator>Bolivar Schaghnaste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehappiestmedium.com/?p=11675#comment-1819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who thinks (and is willing to put the idea out in the public as a critic of the art form) that burlesque has anything to do with &quot;taking it off&quot; is revealing ignorance of the art form and it&#039;s historical and cultural  importance  - how embarrassing for this site - got some learn&#039;n before engaging mouth]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who thinks (and is willing to put the idea out in the public as a critic of the art form) that burlesque has anything to do with &#8220;taking it off&#8221; is revealing ignorance of the art form and it&#8217;s historical and cultural  importance  &#8211; how embarrassing for this site &#8211; got some learn&#8217;n before engaging mouth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
